On Thu, 2005-01-27 at 14:44 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On Thu, 2005-01-27 at 08:16 -0500, Jeff Johnson wrote:
> Thomas Vander Stichele wrote:
>
> >c) nothing more was ever offered as negative feedback on mach than "it
> >uses apt" (a fact that is easily changeable, obviously);
> >
>
> Well clearly, having mach rely on a package that is not included in any Red
> Hat product,
RH has the ability to change this at any time.
not for the ABE, that has to work for all past releases which are set in
stone.