Have you managed to get this to work, or what is the particular issue? Seeing "%fontmeta" in there reminds me of the unbreaking which I did back then for adf-accanthis-fonts. The upshot was that a packager suggested new font packaging macros which required a change in rpm (or base macros, don't remember), moved some font packages to the new macros and then rage-quit when the rpm changes were not accepted, leaving some font packages in a state of FTBFS. I unbroke the package above by undoing some changes, (maybe unnecessarily) removing %fontmeta, undong some %expand-magic and adding back "-a" to a few calls. I would hope that the current template leads to a working font spec for a simple font, but the templates might be from that mentioned phase, and I haven't checked whether the rpm side ever got changed. Maybe take this to font SIG? _______________________________________________
Not yet.
I haven't got the time to fully work the spec file. Trying to
generate a font specfile for testing purpose from rpmdev-newspec
failed due to missing template even tough fonts-rpm-templates
is already installed.
I will post on fonts mailing list and see what they will say.
-- Luya Tshimbalanga Fedora Design Team Fedora Design Suite maintainer