On Fri, Dec 07, 2007 at 07:40:34AM -0900, Jeff Spaleta wrote:
On Dec 7, 2007 4:24 AM, Patrice Dumas <pertusus(a)free.fr>
wrote:
> The target for dpkg are not casual users, and casual users won't use it
> anyway.
And when someone wants to put a dpkg-enabled tool in the distro that
does target casual users?
What kind of tool are you thinking of? If we have tools that use dpkg
then there is a lack of proper integration. The solution is not to have
a non functional dpkg, but properly integrated packages.
It's a slippery slope. We avoid
being on that slope by not having a fully functional dpkg on the system at all.
It is better if the dpkg we give is upstream dpkg, such that user can
use it in any way they want.
--
Pat