On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 3:21 PM, Gerald Henriksen <ghenriks(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Sun, 26 Sep 2010 13:41:38 +0200, you wrote:
>On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 10:02 PM, Kevin Fenzi <kevin(a)scrye.com> wrote:
>> On Sat, 25 Sep 2010 15:53:49 -0400
>> Brandon Lozza <brandon(a)pwnage.ca> wrote:
>>
>>> It would be nice to list it somewhere as an exception, to avoid
>>> panics :)
>>
>> Well, I personally do not want to say:
>>
>> "Hey, anytime you like down the road, you get an exception to push a
>> new major version. Have fun".
>
>Well, reading FESCo meeting, it was that we're allowed to do one major
>update to Fn due to the different release-cycles of Fedora and KDE.
>Bad enough that we need "exceptions" to do our expected work and be
>able to be the working official KDE part of Fedora.
Perhaps then you should approach KDE and ask them why they are so
distribution unfriendly with their release schedule.
Why should they align the releases more with Fedora? Because Fedora is
the #1 KDE distro? Think about it. KDE isn't distribution unfriendly.
Fedora lately becomes KDE unfriendly. *Please* stop to rant, all the
ranting becomes old quickly.
--
Best regards
Thomas