Le ven 07/11/2003 à 17:59, Jesse Keating a écrit :
On Friday 07 November 2003 08:47, Axel Thimm wrote:
> While I personally support this scheme, I was under the impression
> that there were more people against enforcing rpm upgrades for
> minimally changes (e.g. fedora-legacy should only provide security
> related errata). Especially because RH itself did not issue errata
> for rpm despite the known problems.
> In fact, Warren, I believe we were the only two supporting rpm
> upgrades, so unless we are the only left subscribers of
> fedora-legacy, it is not yet an agreement of the whole list. ;)
I personally agreed to it, until somebody showed me clear evidence that
it could/would break something.
I supported it too I wasn't the only one.
Is this "me too thread" really useful ? Did anyone propose an
alternative scheme that had any chance to work ?