Axel Thimm wrote:
On Sun, Jul 01, 2007 at 05:02:41AM +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> Axel Thimm wrote:
>
>> Whether it's "incorrectly" or not is up to the eye of the
beholder,
>> and FWIW README.distribution is serving neither side of the
>> grammar. Or is this package really going to be used in a
>> "distribution"? I'm quite sure it will be.
> Distribution is just a off hand suggestion. Feel free to come up with a
> better name like others have suggested.
How about README.Fedora?
Axel, Don't waste everyone's time.
Rahul