2009/1/2 Brian Pepple <bpepple(a)fedoraproject.org>:
On Fri, 2009-01-02 at 18:36 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> Twenty reviews of small packages, which are trivial to review (or even
> flawless to begin with because the packager is experienced!), or reviews
> of package rename requests, may be less of an achievement than one review
> of a big beast with dependencies, which has been waiting in the review
> queue for many months and needed lots of work.
Totally agree with you, but I don't think we have any way currently to
differentiate the difficulty between reviews that we could extract into
a report.
The number of comments the reviewer himself added to the review ticket
could give a hint on how to complicated the review was.
- Thomas