2009/1/2 Brian Pepple <bpepple(a)fedoraproject.org>:
On Fri, 2009-01-02 at 18:36 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> Twenty reviews of small packages, which are trivial to review (or even
> flawless to begin with because the packager is experienced!), or reviews
> of package rename requests, may be less of an achievement than one review
> of a big beast with dependencies, which has been waiting in the review
> queue for many months and needed lots of work.
Totally agree with you, but I don't think we have any way currently to
differentiate the difficulty between reviews that we could extract into
The number of comments the reviewer himself added to the review ticket
could give a hint on how to complicated the review was.