On 9/26/19 8:42 AM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
Again, I'd like to reinforce that the idea is not to enforce any
part of this
workflow tomorrow, it'll be a smooth, slow and long transition. My question is
whether this is a place where we want to go or can we come up with a
different/better one?:)
The problem with this statement is that this is written as "come up with something
different or else we're doing it my way anyway" and not "ok, we'll not
do this."
I don't want a build for every commit. Sometimes I cache changes for future
releases. A commit does *not* always equal an update. This proposed workflow model
doesn't help me. It hurts. It makes me think of dropping my roles from Fedora.
With that said I believe there are some good parts to it, but the PR for everything
and builds for every commit are show-stoppers.