On Wed, 2010-08-04 at 11:46 -0400, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
On Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 10:17:27AM +0100, pbrobinson(a)gmail.com
wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 9:55 AM, Tomasz Torcz <tomek(a)pipebreaker.pl> wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 08:32:07PM -0400, David Malcolm wrote:
> >> Rawhide (dist-f14) now has python 2.7
> >
> > I have a machine which run rawhide since F11 times. Recently upgrade to
> > python2.7 failed because of "rhpl" package. rhpl was removed from
Fedora
> > some time ago, so it wasn't rebuild lately.
> > Now the question: what package should cause rhpl to be removed during update?
> > Is there any obsoletes or conflicts that should cause rhpl to be removed
> > during upgrades (F11→F15 time frame)?
>
> I noticed this the other day as well. It should have been obsoleted by
> something so that it was removed on upgrade.
>
We've talked about adding Obsoletes for packages that are no longer in the
repository with no replacement (as is the case for rhpl) to something like
fedora-release before but AFAIK we've never pulled the trigger on actually
doing it.
I think I had suggested it, multiple times, and each time fesco had a
problem with it.
maybe even the package was named package-swift
http://skvidal.fedorapeople.org/misc/package-swift.spec
-sv