On Sat, Feb 17, 2024 at 11:17 AM Michel Lind <salimma@fedoraproject.org> wrote:
On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 07:53:38PM +0000, Christopher Klooz wrote:
> On 14/02/2024 17.35, Michel Lind wrote:
> > As a pandoc user, I'm happy to help with any reviews. Is there a list
> > where this tends to get posted, apart from devel?
 
Thanks Michel for taking the base64 review.

I realised a second open package review is https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2068718 (isocline)
- it's a newer dep for pandoc (actually hslua-repl).

Was just wondering if there's another place where Haskell packaging is coordinated.

It is a good question...

I was trying to do that previously in the Haskell SIG (mailing list and channel), but the traction became so low that I largely gave up with that... other than occasionally begging someone specifically to help with an urgent review. ;-(
I can certainly send out such mails there and/or here going forward for more direct awareness.
(Not sure if it makes sense to post to Discourse: Haskell library reviews are still a little bit "esoteric" since ghc uses some non-standard linking (ie various warnings appear which tend to discourage/throw less experienced reviewers alas: perhaps they should be spelled out further as exception(s) in the Haskell Packaging policy, so I don't need to keep explaining them).

I will be posting more reviews soon: in particular a large bunch of hslua related packages - though I think it is better to roll them out in reverse dependency order.

Jens