On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 12:32 PM, Genes MailLists <lists(a)sapience.com> wrote:
On 09/07/2011 09:57 AM, Josh Boyer wrote:
> %changelog isn't for developers. It's for users to see what the
> developers changed in the package.
Would a git-shortlog suffice for %changelog ? Assuming appropriate
comments are required for fedora's git repo.
No... users can access %changelog for the RPMs on their system via
rpm. Making them go to a git repository elsewhere to figure out what
changed isn't exactly friendly.
Unless of course you meant "have fedpkg automatically stick a
git-shortlog into the %changelog section of the spec file on commit"
or something. Then.. maybe.
And yes, this assumes in all cases that developers are actually
putting useful information in both %changelog and commit logs.