I am sorry if this has been discussed before but I do not remember it.

The culprit to this message was the review of R-pak


While running fedora-review that uses mock I found that I had an issue installing the corresponding rpm in rawhide. And surely enough running the same command it failed:

# /usr/bin/dnf --installroot /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/root/ --releasever 34 --setopt=deltarpm=False --allowerasing --disableplugin=local --disableplugin=spacewalk install /home/jamatos/tmp/1883047-R-pak/results/R-pak-0.1.2-1.fc34.noarch.rpm --setopt=tsflags=nocontexts

No matches found for the following disable plugin patterns: local, spacewalk

fedora                                                                                                                                                                                                       4.4 MB/s |  74 MB     00:16   

Last metadata expiration check: 0:00:17 ago on Wed 30 Sep 2020 10:21:53 AM WEST.


 Problem: conflicting requests

  - nothing provides R(rprojroot) >= 1.3.2 needed by R-pak-0.1.2-1.fc34.noarch

(try to add '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages or '--nobest' to use not only best candidate packages)

Consulting the page for R-rprojroot


we also do not see any build for Fedora 34. I already saw this also for other packages where it only shows after a rebuild.

On the other hand asking directly to rawhide we get:

# dnf -q list R-rprojroot --disablerepo=\* --enablerepo=rawhide

Available Packages

R-rprojroot.noarch         1.3.2-9.fc33              rawhide

And so in fact there is a match and so the packages is available at rawhide.

My doubt and the reason to post this is to ask if this is the same issue or if it corresponds to different issues, one for src.fedoraproject.org (I always forget the backend name) and another for mock.

Best regards,

PS: no linkers or debug formats were involved in the compose of this message. :-)


José Abílio