Le vendredi 13 juin 2014 à 15:07 +0200, Petr Spacek a écrit :
On 13.6.2014 14:58, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> Am 13.06.2014 14:53, schrieb Jan Zelený:
>> That being said, the reason for not renaming dnf to yum is that renaming this
>> project to yum will do nothing else than to confuse its users, as they will
>> think this is still yum and they should expect from dnf it what they expected
>> from yum. They should not. And dnf is not yum, I'm really sorry if you
think
>> it is.
>
> the user expects that anyways if you replace something he
> did not asked for replace it and what just worked for him
>
> why do so many developers not understand that simple fact?
I don't think that simple fact that DNF is re-write of YUM justifies re-naming
and re-training all users. Users don't care what you do with the source. And
of course, users will complain no matter what you do.
Like they complained when up2date was replaced by yum ?
when zipper replaced whatever they used to have on *suse before ?
When pkgin replaced pkg_add on some of the BSD ?
It happened in the past, and I do not remember seeing so much
complains..
--
Michael Scherer