On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 04:41:53AM +0000, Peter Robinson wrote:
I agree on the systemd-filesystem side of things, the binaries
sounds
like it would be better described as systemd-utils with a provides for
-units.
This could be a good idea, but I think that having an additional
name would cause more confusion. The name is arbitrary anyway.
I don't believe you necessarily need systemd in some container
situations so possibly that's what's being looked at.
Yes, also that.
Zbyszek