On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 12:06 PM, Bernd Stramm <bernd.stramm(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, 25 Jun 2011 10:41:36 -0600
Kevin Fenzi <kevin(a)scrye.com> wrote:
> I welcome posts back on the technical topic of trusted boot. ;)
So can we have specifics about what it's good for? Not how it is
implemented, but what the purposes are.
And who the "trusted" entities are (can be) in the chain of trust.
Those sorts of technical topics would be interesting.
I agree this would be interesting.
On a more practical level I'd like to hear with more specifics about
how this fits the definition of a feature as stated here
Does it meet any of the points 1, 2, or 4?
If it is proposed as a feature based on either or both of points 3 and
5 has marketing or anyone outside of FESCo been involved in deciding
whether this meets those requirements from their perspective? I ask
this because points 3 and 5 don't seem to be based on anything