Once upon a time, Stephen John Smoogen <smooge(a)gmail.com> said:
My understanding is that /usr/bin/soffice is a symlink in order to
keep backwards maintainability. Personally I say both packages drop it
because star office is soooo 1999. :)
There's more than just soffice:
$ rpm -ql libreoffice-core | grep bin/ | xargs ls -ld
-rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 362 Dec 6 18:37 /usr/bin/libreoffice
-rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 32 Dec 6 18:37 /usr/bin/ooffice
-rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 39 Dec 6 18:37 /usr/bin/ooviewdoc
lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 11 Jan 9 12:46 /usr/bin/openoffice.org -> libreoffice
lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 38 Jan 9 12:46 /usr/bin/soffice ->
/usr/lib64/libreoffice/program/soffice
-rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 360 Dec 6 18:37 /usr/bin/unopkg
I expect that AOO would want oofice, ooviewdoc, and
openoffice.org. I
don't know what unopkg is.
--
Chris Adams <cmadams(a)hiwaay.net>
Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services
I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble.