I'm afraid not. From the very beginning, we were sending a clear message that
we will be as compatible as possible in terms of CLI but we never wanted to
have just another yum. If that was the case, we wouldn't call the project
differently.
I am concerned that the yum-to-dnf transition is confusing, because
of this mixed message. On one hand, they are just two package
management tools: on a high level, they do a simple, well defined
job of updating your system to the latest version of available
packages. In an ideal world it just wouldn't matter which one you
use, and from that point of view the name change is superfluous: all
you need to do is 'yum update', and calling it 'dnf update' is just
a tiny annoyance that is not bothersome enough to be worth bothering
about.