2 Jun
2014
2 Jun
'14
9:19 a.m.
On Sat, 31 May 2014 00:31:50 +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
As of 2014, I only know two cases where clang is still better: more complete caret diagnostics, and better recovery from invalid types (clang provides suggestions and uses it for the rest of the compilation to avoid cascaded error messages).
wrong caret / lineno for wrong ctor field initializer http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59621
diagnostics: missing proper file:line on C++ compilation error http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58589
Jan