On Wed, Aug 14, 2019 at 11:29 AM Miro Hrončok mhroncok@redhat.com wrote:
On 14. 08. 19 8:55, Frantisek Zatloukal wrote:
It depends on package maintainer. If upstream dropped 32-bit support,
I'd stop
building it for that arch in Fedora.
Why would package maintainer have to bear the burden of potential
breakage if
upstream doesn't test it?
If neither of my upstreams officially supports s390x, should I just drop it everywhere?
The real question which every packager should ask himself is: Do I have the capacity (time, knowledge, hardware, etc.) to solve problems on non-supported architecture by upstream? And if the answer is no - it is probably better to drop the arch instead of shipping smth that not even the maintainer knows whether it is usable at all (like I used to ship eclipse on 32 bit arm although I'm quite sure it was not usable at all).
-- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org