I was aware of that, which is why I suggested Enano CMS. It is a hybrid of a
wiki and a CMS, implementing literally the best of both worlds.
On Dec 20, 2007 6:00 PM, Karsten Wade <kwade(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On Sat, 2007-12-15 at 09:23 -0600, King InuYasha wrote:
> If we do decide to move to a CMS
A CMS solves a different set of problems than a wiki.
The core of what makes a CMS useful (workflow and management of content
over time, levels of control (ACLs) for certain content) is anathema to
what a wiki is (fast changes, many hands involved, rapidly moving
content through time.)
There is no reason we cannot have both. It is why daMaestro is rolling
out Plone for
docs.fedoraproject.org.
- Karsten
--
Karsten Wade, Developer Community Mgr.
Dev Fu :
http://developer.redhatmagazine.com
Fedora :
http://quaid.fedorapeople.org
gpg key : AD0E0C41
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list(a)redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list