Perhaps he was just not aware of these objections. Although I could not
speak for him but it's at least a possible explanation for the proposal.
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 9:18 AM, Adam Williamson <awilliam(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On Fri, 2012-05-04 at 12:50 +0700, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
> On 04/27/2012 08:58 PM, Jared K. Smith wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 9:50 AM, Colin Walters <walters(a)verbum.org>
> >> The whole thing is clearly a mess that needs some high level
> >> streamlining, from the entire process of download from web page (or
> >> receive CD from friend) to the on-disk install first boot.
> > While I certainly wouldn't disagree with this statement, let's not let
> > perfect get in the way of better here.
> > What can we do in the *near* term to make it easier for people to find
> > the "Install to Hard Drive" option from the LiveCD?
> How about installing the Dock extension on the liveuser account, and
> configuring it to *not* auto-hide? That way we get a solution that
> a) many users use anyway
> b) is aesthetically pleasing
I don't see the point of making proposals like this which it's quite
clear have absolutely no chance of happening. Desktop team has already
stated clearly that they won't set up extensions as default
configuration. Continuing to 'suggest' that they do is only likely to
rile them up and start another of those long boring argumentative
threads that have no purpose...
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora
devel mailing list