On Fri, 2005-02-25 at 11:10 +0000, Ron Yorston wrote:
Bill Nottingham <notting(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>David Woodhouse (dwmw2(a)infradead.org) said:
>> On Thu, 2005-02-24 at 16:25 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
>> >Dropping it may be drastic; it could be moved to extras.
>>
>> Until FC5, those two are equivalent. Having accepted that FC4/i386 isn't
>> going to fit onto 4 CDs
>
>FC4 i386 *is* going to fit on 4 CDs (almost certainly). It's x86_64
>and possibly ppc that is over.
and, earlier,
Elliot Lee <sopwith(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>Something that needs to be mentioned - it was decided that it was better
>to go to 5 CDs for now than to kick eclipse and the Java stuff out.
Will you @redhat.com people please get your stories straight?
And if it is 5 CDs can we have Xfce back, please?
Ron,
This isn't about 'getting stories straight' it's not like red hat is a
single mind acting in unison. It's not like any open source project is
like that either.
Here's the deal. Xfce got dropped out of core b/c we're trying to shave
off some misc packages. Do I think it'll be in extras? Yes. I actually
think it will:
1. be in extras
2. be kept more updated from extras
3. not be a problem for you.
I know it's hard to believe but we're trying to get everything together
and sometimes it just takes a little time.
-sv