On Sun, 2012-05-13 at 12:21 +0700, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
Apart from the worrying test suite results on secondary archs,
actually it's the libstdc++ issue that's causing the most headache.
How much effort does it take to maintain a compatibility version of
libstdc++? It'd make clang much more useful if we're not caught
between upstream (that abandons released versions) and the Fedora GCC
team's fast update cycles.
Apologies, I'm not familiar with this part of the eternal waking
nightmare called C++. Can you give more details?
- ajax