i havent tried it myself but i will be going to make test packages for
further evaluation. curious to see what benefits it has.
regards,
Rudolf Kastl
p.s. there are various more unknown systems i yet just didnt consider
worth investigating due to lack of upstream progress or incomplete
featuresets etc.
2007/4/5, Jochen Schlick <jochen.schlick(a)comsoft.de>:
What's about "runit" from Gerrit Pape
http://smarden.org/runit/index.html
It's small, fast - with dietlibc it has a very small memory footprint.
Ok, it's very different from the sysv-init scheme but afaik it can be
configured to be LSB compliant. I use it on some Fedora PCs for
several daemons and system-config-services is also able to
control this daemons.
best regards, Jochen
Mark wrote:
> than just ask it :)
>
> can we please :
> "get a bit more constructive feedback about the current
> state of various init systems and/or help/patches/ideas about future
> init systems from a pure scientific/technical point of view from
> people with first hand experience with trying out those systems on
> fedora."
>
> 2007/4/4, Rudolf Kastl <che666(a)gmail.com <mailto:che666@gmail.com>>:
>
> its a bit of a pity this thread is drifting a bit off the init system
> discussion from my point of view because the thread topic now is
> somewhat misleading.
>
> i was hoping to get a bit more constructive feedback about the current
> state of various init systems and/or help/patches/ideas about future
> init systems from a pure scientific/technical point of view from
> people with first hand experience with trying out those systems on
> fedora.
>
> regards,
> Rudolf Kastl
>
> --
> fedora-devel-list mailing list
> fedora-devel-list(a)redhat.com <mailto:fedora-devel-list@redhat.com>
>
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
>
>
--
------------------------------------------------------------
Jochen Schlick
mailto:jochen.schlick_at_comsoft.de
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list(a)redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list