On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 09:29:37PM +0530, Rakesh Pandit wrote:
On 15 May 2010 21:07, Till Maas wrote:
> The upstream release monitoring tool (formerly fever) is not
> to identify such packages, because there is no process to identify
> non-uptodate packages like there is a process to identify old FTBS-bugs.
Yes, and I think it is time to draft a proposal for same. Remember
Seth also had a script (which he ran quite recently to figure our
A current problem I see with using upstream release monitoring is that
there is no easy way to query which bugs are ignored, because it is
perfectly valid to not touch the bug as a maintainer but only update the
package. This will avoid a new bug to be filed, but the maintainer will
still be notified with a new comment.