On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 4:53 AM, Peter Robinson <pbrobinson(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 4:49 AM, Michael Cronenworth
<mike(a)cchtml.com> wrote:
> On 12/07/2016 04:29 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
>>
>> -1 at least for the moment. b
>
>
> Is this due to sugar? Would you accept patches?
One of the reasons, and of course, I think if we want to actively
retire packages we need to enage with the owners of the dependencies.
And yes, already engaging with the upstream. Just not all upstreams
have a lot of resources to chase fixes for things they see as already
working.