On 08/13/2015 03:17 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Tue, 2015-08-04 at 10:47 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 04, 2015 at 10:40:28AM -0400, Paul W. Frields wrote:
>> "Ambivalent" is probably understated here. It's hard to imagine
>> people securing i686 hardware these days to run a Workstation
>> experience, after all.
> The question, I think, is how much we want to prioritize the
> "Workstation experience" on older hardware (or on devices like the
> Baytrail tablets).
Just to this point - if we wanted to support the Baytrail tablets
properly we should probably get 64-on-32 working. Allowing 32-bit UEFI
installs probably isn't something we want to do officially.
Has this changed due to IoT?