Matt Domsch wrote :
On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 02:21:32PM +0100, Florian La Roche wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 02:14:57PM +0100, Matthias Saou wrote:
> > Florian La Roche wrote :
> > > > This is neat, and ultimately quite useful. Would somebody be willing
> > > > try this with Extras too? (I guess "everything" will be a
> > > > difficult because of more explicit conflicts)
> > >
> > > We can run this test again in 2 or 3 weeks to see how F7 looks like
> > > and then also add the FE packages to what we currently call a
> > > "full FC" chroot.
> > It would be a good idea, since I'm pretty sure interesting results
> > will pop-up, especially some ("used to be") Core packages being able
> > include some optional functionality provided by ("used to be")
> > packages... some of which we might even want/like to have.
> Other possibility is that maybe Matt Domsch could also pick this
> up for his rebuild scripts? Matt, ??
They already do. :-)
Wow! It uncovers SO MANY BUGS!!! Many noarch python packages ending up
using the sitearch dir when rebuilt on x86_64, for instance.
It would really be interesting going through most of these.
Clean custom Red Hat Linux rpm packages : http://freshrpms.net/
Fedora Core release 6 (Zod) - Linux kernel 2.6.19-1.2895.fc6
Load : 1.15 1.11 0.73