On Tue, Jul 09, 2013 at 01:00:27PM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
>> = Proposed System Wide Change: ARM as primary Architecture
> How many F19 packages currently fail to build (or are excluded but
> shouldn't be) on ARM? How do we stand against the other items of
I'm particularly curious about the developer resources and release
criteria items. The proposal calls out one kernel maintainer, which
is great, but doesn't expand on how many others are doing ARM work.
Is the ARM team on the hook to go through all of the existing QA
criteria on ARM platforms and do they have enough resources to do
I wouldn't limit the things I'm willing to fix to the kernel. I'll
happily look into all ARM FTBFS.