On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 08:57:47PM +0000, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
On 04/23/2012 08:14 PM, Jared K. Smith wrote:
>>> Fesco is saying that if you have hardware that can install via Anaconda,
>>> you must support installing via Anaconda. It's legitimate for you to
>>> also have other install mechanisms, and hardware that's incapable of
>>> supporting Anaconda installs isn't required to have them.
>Thanks for the clarification. I just wanted to make sure I understood that.
FESCo should make that more clear in the requirements but even if
they do they still make secondary architecture solely depended upon
the will and the time of someone within the "Installer team" to
implement the solution required to install Fedora for their
architecture before they can become primary architecture.
Yes, in the same way that they need someone in the kernel team to build
them a kernel. It's a package. It's under active development. It just
needs someone on the architecture to write the code.
Matthew Garrett | mjg59(a)srcf.ucam.org