On Sat, Sep 26, 2009 at 9:53 AM, Kevin Kofler <kevin.kofler(a)chello.at> wrote:
drago01 wrote:
> As for the GPG signature ... can't the drpm itself be signed?
If the metadata is getting signed, it basically is already. The metadata
contains a checksum of the DRPM, so if the metadata passes the signature
check and the DRPM matches the checksum, the DRPM's integrity and
uncompromisedness is verified. So I think it's safe to disable the checksum
check for the rebuilt RPMs entirely.
Well if this is the case then we can simply not compress the generated
rpms, problem solved.