Thomas J. Baker wrote:
On Wed, 2006-05-31 at 16:16 +0200, dragoran wrote:
> Thomas J. Baker wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 2006-05-31 at 09:32 -0400, Jeff Spaleta wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On 5/31/06, Thomas J. Baker <tjb(a)unh.edu> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> Fixed with today's update. Menus are a much too translucent
though...
>>>> Would that be metacity or something else?
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Assuming you define 'too translucent' like I do, meaning any
>>> translucency at all, the fix is to turn off the bling completely.
>>>
>>>
>>> --jef"So who is going to sponsor the usability study to determine the
>>> best level of default transparency percentage down to the fifth
>>> significant digit? I simply can't wait to read over the minutia of
>>> that discussion. blaaaaah"spaleta
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193655
>>
>> At first blush, being a bling fanboy, I thought it was just too much
>> translucency and could be tweaked. The more I think about it though, the
>> more I lean towards menus not being translucent at all.
>>
>> tjb
>>
>>
> any screenshot?
>
>
http://wintermute.sr.unh.edu/~tjb/Screenshot.png
tjb
ok thats a joke ...
how about making the this optional?
menu translucent? yes - no
if yes xx%