On Mon, 2017-09-04 at 16:11 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Mon, 2017-09-04 at 20:07 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
>
> That is the point, how many package fail to build with ImageMagick7
> ?
> we "just" need change requires on FTBFS packages (with
> ImageMagick7)
No it isn't the point. More things actually use the ImageMagick *CLI*
than use the library, and the CLI of ImageMagick 7 is very different
from the CLI of ImageMagick 6. This is the *main* reason we do not
just
want to make the ImageMagick package suddenly become ImageMagick 7 -
because IM 7 does not provide the CLI people currently expect from
the
package called 'ImageMagick'. It's not primarily about things which
build against the libraries.
OK, I understood your point of view and I change my opinion to youropinion .
Best regards,
--
Sérgio M. B.