On Thu, 2005-03-03 at 10:33 +0000, David Woodhouse wrote:
On Thu, 2005-03-03 at 01:30 -0800, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> Then the guidelines should be changed to accomodate
> this. Wasnt flexible trademark guidelines one of the
> changes for the rename to Fedora?
It would certainly be useful if the trademark guidelines permitted one
to build and distribute a DVD or set of CDs which contains _only_
Fedora Core, Fedora Extras and the official updates to those.
I think it might - but maybe we should get a clarification:
http://fedora.redhat.com/about/trademarks/guidelines/page4.html
They must only use the Fedora™ mark in association with the original
Fedora™ code found on the Fedora Project website (see
http://fedora.redhat.com/) without modification
Both extras and core are available here, and updates also.
http://fedora.redhat.com/about/trademarks/guidelines/page5.html
So we'd be shipping unmodified Fedora Core, Updates and Extras as a
work. Which is still identifiable as Fedora. So I don't think we fall
into the "seperate patches" category.
Paul