On 07/25/2015 11:18 AM, Remi Collet wrote:
Le 24/07/2015 15:49, Florian Festi a écrit :
> The freshly released rpm-4.12.90 aka rpm-4.13.0-alpha is going to hit
> rawhide soon. The two major new features are:
>
> * Boolean (aka rich) dependencies to support more complicated relation
> between packages
> * File Triggers - run scripts if files get installed in given paths -
> possibly to replace most of the regular - per package - scriptlets at
> some point in the future.
>
> But for now and for Fedora this update is more about testing and
> stabilizing the many smaller changes as far as they have not been ported
> back already.
>
> See the draft release notes for details:
http://rpm.org/wiki/Releases/4.13.0
It seems we have a regression (thanks Koschei)
See
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/work/tasks/4402/10474402/build.log
In spec (which is quite common, I think)
%doc imagick-3.1.2/{CREDITS,TODO,INSTALL}
During %doc
+ cp -pr imagick-3.1.2/CREDITS imagick-3.1.2/TODO imagick-3.1.2/INSTALL
/builddir/build/BUILDROOT/php-pecl-imagick-3.1.2-3.fc24.i386/usr/share/doc/php-pecl-imagick
+ exit 0
RPM build errors:
error: File not found:
/builddir/build/BUILDROOT/php-pecl-imagick-3.1.2-3.fc24.i386/usr/share/doc/php-pecl-imagick/{CREDITS,TODO,INSTALL}
File not found:
/builddir/build/BUILDROOT/php-pecl-imagick-3.1.2-3.fc24.i386/usr/share/doc/php-pecl-imagick/{CREDITS,TODO,INSTALL}
Do you want me to file a bug ?
Remi
Hi,
there is another change involving %doc. A piece of libdvdread.spec: "
%files
%defattr(-,root,root,-)
%doc AUTHORS COPYING NEWS README
%{_libdir}/libdvdread.so.*
%files devel
%defattr(-,root,root,-)
%doc ChangeLog TODO
...
"
With old rpm, files ChangeLog and TODO were included in both
libdvdread.rpm and libdvdread-devel.rpm. With this new rpm, koji build
fails with: "
Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
/usr/share/doc/libdvdread/ChangeLog
/usr/share/doc/libdvdread/TODO
"
Which behavior is correct? I guess both are wrong. Should bugzillas be
filed?
Have a nice day,
Fero