Jesse Keating wrote:
On Thursday 28 June 2007 22:54:45 Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> Hi
>
> A recent discussion in EPEL about whether README.Fedora would be
> confusing to EPEL users has brought into forefront what I consider a
> good packaging guideline for Fedora to follow which is to avoid using
> the "Fedora" name as much as possible in package names and files with
> exceptions like "Fedora directory server" and recommend using generic
> names wherever possible.
>
> This would certainly help in being a better upstream for distribution
> and other efforts that are based on Fedora including RHEL, EPEL or OLPC.
>
> In this specific instance I believe the guidelines should be mandating
> README.distribution instead.
>
> Refer to
>
https://www.redhat.com/archives/epel-devel-list/2007-June/msg00064.html
> for the discussion.
>
> Rahul
At what point does this become silly though?
Do you want me to define silly or give an example where I consider it
silly? I think trying to rename Fedora Directory Server at this point
would be silly as opposed to the above request which I consider valid.
Do you disagree with that request or the general idea or both?
Rahul