I agree this is inconvenient for me ;) That's why I tried to suggest a solution for my inconvenience. All I suggested is to have dependent packages on the same disk, which I think could be done.

2006/5/4, Thomas M Steenholdt <tmus@tmus.dk>:
Peter Bieshaar wrote:
> I didn't mean previous FC CDs. But keeping rpm's more structured on
> CD's. So keep the dependent rpm's at least on the same CD. Just did
> a mysql server installation, needed 2 CDs.
>

The thing is that although this is inconvenient for you in this case,
chances are that other packages are depending on some of the same libs
and it may be hard to fit everything that have interdependencies on a
single disc, as long as FC is as large as it is atm.

/Thomas


--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list



--
Peter Bieshaar
NL(0)6 29577255
use this or: peter@bieshaar.org