On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 5:54 PM, Miloslav Trmač <mitr(a)volny.cz> wrote:
nnnOn Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 3:00 PM, Jaroslav Reznik
<jreznik(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> = Proposed System Wide Change: ARM as primary Architecture =
>
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ARM_as_Primary
How many F19 packages currently fail to build (or are excluded but
shouldn't be) on ARM? How do we stand against the other items of
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Secondary_Architecture_Promotion_Requirements
At F-19 gold we were missing around 233 source packages out of around
13,500 total. These are broken down into a couple of groups:
- Non ARM packages (x86/PPC/s390)
- Languages not currerntly supported on ARM - eg D, a fpc and a few others
- Packages that have issues with their CFLAGS (and actually should be
fine if they used distro flags like they should)
- Random other problems.
I'm planning on going through these again and document the remaining packages.
Peter