On 29 Aug 2013 18:12, "Kevin Fenzi" <kevin(a)scrye.com> wrote:
On Thu, 29 Aug 2013 09:05:24 +0300
Panu Matilainen <pmatilai(a)laiskiainen.org> wrote:
...snip...
> Let me say AWESOME one more time :)
:)
I actually didn't know that this was so much of a bottleneck for you
folks. ;(
Anyhow, glad we can move forward and hopefully get things rolling
faster.
> > Of course it does mean we could run into breakage if there's
> > breakage in Fedora land, but thats good to know and fix too.
>
> Yes, dogfooding on the builders can IMO only be a good thing for
> overall stability of Fedora, even if it might initially cause some
> extra hickups. Breaking the builders a couple of times and getting
> scolded for that ought to make people think a bit more about pushing
> potentially destabilizing updates :)
Exactly.
I know we discovered a few issues in the last couple of years doing this
with arm because of using the stable fedora arm release so I'm glad we're
able to help :-)
Pete