On Sun, 2005-03-06 at 20:03 -0500, Eric Warnke wrote:
>Just a quick question. Was there a reason why the ipw2200
>weren't updated to 1.0.1, instead of 1.0.0?
Probably becuase the odd ending number represnets a development
not stable. 1.0.2 will be the next stable release.
Ah, that's good answer. All these different version numbering schemes
can get confusing (and I just assumed it was a little like gnome or the