Axel Thimm wrote:
> +1, although it would be a good idea to put the static libs in a
> seperate sub package. ( /me has no need for such a beast)
Have you seen Dmitry Butskoy's post on this? He has created debuginfo
macros that automatically cater for that (packages are then named
foo-static, but that's tunable) w/o any changes in existing
specfiles.
Yeah I've seen that but I'm not sure if I like that, thats because I'm
not sure if we should offer static libs for all packages or only for
certain ones (like glibc, libstdc++, some standard X11 libs)
Regards,
Hans