On 08/25/2017 05:19 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> I dunno what order the list you're using is in, but
apparently you
> didn't do emacs?
>
> Igor Gnatenko tried, for Rawhide:
>
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=961777
>
> but in fact what happened with that build is ImageMagick support was
> simply entirely disabled, see
>
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//packages/emacs/25.2/8.fc28/data/logs/...
:
>
> "checking for IMAGEMAGICK... no"
>
> there appears to be a partially working patch from January available in
> a mailing list thread upstream:
>
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2017-01/msg00191.html
There's also an emacs bug report:
https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=25967
where a whole load of nothing much seems to be happening. Except they
updated the build scripts to explicitly reject version 7.
Sorry. I was following Kevin's old list, which appears to be incomplete.
I'm working on emacs now. PLD-Linux has a patch I'm using. A local mock build
worked
so I'll push my commit shortly.
http://git.pld-linux.org/gitweb.cgi?p=packages/emacs.git;a=blob;f=imagema...
I don't use Emacs so I'd need someone who does to test it. Worst-case, I'd
like to
leave ImageMagick at 7 and create a compat-ImageMagick-6 if Emacs breaks. Many of
these failures are with software with no active upstream and I uncovered a FTBFS[1]
that has been going on since Fedora 23 that should have been retired. I wouldn't
want to waste my time with a compat package for them.
[1]
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1423317