On 30 March 2012 22:41, Kevin Kofler <kevin.kofler(a)chello.at> wrote:
Ian Malone wrote:
> Interesting, not sure how you'd tell that. I've now noticed the header
> #This file is part of systemd.
> And rpm -qf confirms that, but why don't systemd and udev get into
> conflict over it?
Because udev dropped their equivalent 70-acl.rules in favor of systemd's
implementation.
No, what I mean is given its location how does udev ignore it and
systemd know to find it? I assume it's something to do with
'ACTION=="remove", GOTO="uaccess_end"' at the start.
--
imalone