Rex Dieter wrote:
Ralf Ertzinger wrote:
> On Wed, 4 Oct 2006 11:07:23 -0400, Jesse Keating wrote:
>
>> I do believe this should have been a --justdb flag.
> Still, if there is still a package owning these files installed
> after the removal the files ought to stay.
Exactly, this used to work fine with previous versions (FC-5) of rpm,
ectually you do not want to use --justdb, because if files were removed
/ renamed fomr one version-release to the other you would ned up with
stale unowned files.
I'm using rawhide for a long time and as such often have yum breakage
causing this kinda dual version installs and have been using rpm -e
old-version without --justdb hapily to fix this for a long time.
Also as reported earlier the same thing happens when removing one arch
of a multi-arch package.
Regards,
Hans