Am 13.06.2014 10:01, schrieb Jan Zelený:
On 12. 6. 2014 at 11:41:52, Simo Sorce wrote:
> We can keep the yum symlink forever...
Definitely, we do no insist on removing it. I am perfectly fine with removing it
some time far in the future when nobody uses it any more
one said "forever", i am not a native english speaker but IMHO
that word has a clear definition
* do not insist on removing it
* removing it some time far in the future
you can have one of them :-)
i have not heard any valid reason to call a software DNF instead just
the next major version of YUM which is millions of times mentioned
and well known everywhere - *forget* DNF as name - you won't revert
the fact that everybody translates it to "Did Not Finish" beause
it has no senseful meaning and so finally you can call it "yum-ng"
and in the history ng-replacements did not change binary names