On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 02:21:32PM +0100, Florian La Roche wrote:
On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 02:14:57PM +0100, Matthias Saou wrote:
> Florian La Roche wrote :
>
> > > This is neat, and ultimately quite useful. Would somebody be willing to
> > > try this with Extras too? (I guess "everything" will be a bit
more
> > > difficult because of more explicit conflicts)
> >
> > We can run this test again in 2 or 3 weeks to see how F7 looks like
> > and then also add the FE packages to what we currently call a
> > "full FC" chroot.
>
> It would be a good idea, since I'm pretty sure interesting results
> will pop-up, especially some ("used to be") Core packages being able to
> include some optional functionality provided by ("used to be") Extras
> packages... some of which we might even want/like to have.
Other possibility is that maybe Matt Domsch could also pick this
up for his rebuild scripts? Matt, ??
They already do. :-)
http://linux.dell.com/files/fedora/fixbuildrequires/mock-results-core/i38...
http://linux.dell.com/files/fedora/fixbuildrequires/mock-results-core/x86...
http://linux.dell.com/files/fedora/fixbuildrequires/mock-results-extras/i...
http://linux.dell.com/files/fedora/fixbuildrequires/mock-results-extras/x...
is the rollup, and each rpm directory under there has their own
rpmdiff (against what's on the download servers)
http://linux.dell.com/files/fedora/fixbuildrequires/mock-results-extras/i...
and rpmlint
http://linux.dell.com/files/fedora/fixbuildrequires/mock-results-extras/i...
--
Matt Domsch
Software Architect
Dell Linux Solutions
linux.dell.com &
www.dell.com/linux
Linux on Dell mailing lists @
http://lists.us.dell.com