Dave Airlie wrote:
On Fri, 2009-04-24 at 17:40 -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
> See, the Desktop team has no say in whether or not a graphical mixer is
> available in Fedora. The middle ground between reverting the mixer
> feature all together and leaving at is it is having a graphical mixer
> installed by default available in the menus. That was the compromise.
The mandate is for both Desktop/LiveCD spin and Fedora default install,
surely the Desktop team does decide for the desktop/livecd spin, but not
or the Fedora install. Since I'm sure the KDE spin won't want to include
either of these.
Jesse was replying to this:
A compromise works best if both parties are on board. I don't
believe
that the desktop guys will object to the package existing and being
installable if people want.
In that context he's saying that "the package existing and being
installable" is not something that the Desktop team has a say over. So
saying that they wouldn't block that from happening is not a compromise.
It's how things would have been without a compromise.
-Toshio