On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 02:10:24PM -0400, Todd Zullinger wrote:
Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> Due to the requirement for contributors to sign the FPCA by Thursday
> of last week, certain package owners who haven't yet signed will be
> removed from the packager group soon. When that happens, the
> packages that they own will be orphaned.
I presume that any packages here which have co-maintainers, one of the
co-maintainers would pick up ownership?
I hope so but it will be a manual process as the pkgdb functionality that
does this is currently disabled (need to add a way for owners to specify
specific people to take over package maintianership [including orphan]
instead of always automatically reassigning to a comaint).
> Please reply to this thread if you'd like to take any
packages or
> ping me on IRC and I'll reply to this thread with what packages have
> been taken. (Needed since we aren't orphaning in the pkgdb until
> Thursday so you need a cvsadmin to reassign ownership for now).
>
>
http://toshio.fedorapeople.org/fpca/packages_losing_owners.txt:
I think this should be:
http://toshio.fedorapeople.org/fpca/packages_losing_owner.txt
(No 's' in owner. :)
Yeah, sorry about that.
> == facter ==
> facter-0:1.5.9-1.fc14.noarch
> puppet-0:0.25.5-1.fc14.noarch
> puppet-0:2.6.6-1.fc14.noarch
> == puppet ==
> puppet-0:2.6.6-1.fc14.noarch
> ace-0:0.0.7-3.fc12.noarch
> puppet-0:2.6.6-1.fc14.noarch
> puppet-server-0:0.25.5-1.fc14.noarch
> puppet-server-0:2.6.6-1.fc14.noarch
> secstate-0:0.4.1-1.fc14.noarch
I didn't see either of these in the first list, so I could be missing
something. I'm happy to be the primary maintainer if that's needed.
And my mistake again, I attached an old copy of the deps list. Attaching an
updated list this time.
-Toshio