On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 6:09 PM, Juan
Rodriguez<nushio(a)fedoraproject.org> wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 11:07 AM, drago01 <drago01(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 6:02 PM, Toshio Kuratomi<a.badger(a)gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > On 07/14/2009 04:16 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
>> >> On Thu, 25 Jun 2009 11:48:33 +0200, Michael wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> * Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently:
>> >>>
>> >>> beagle-owner AT fedoraproject DOT org
>> >>>
>> >>> Recipient address rejected:
>> >>> User unknown in local recipient table (state 14).
>> >>>
>> >>> *
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name shows more
than
>> >>> a
>> >>> dozen people on watchcommit+commit, but no package owner. It's
an
>> >>> orphan.
>> >>>
>> >>> *
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/bugs shows more
than
>> >>> a
>> >>> dozen open tickets, but nobody is subscribed to watchbugzilla.
>> >>>
>> >>> * "yum list beagle" shows beagle-0.3.9-6.fc11 in
"fedora".
>> >>
>> >> There is still no beagle-owner for this package.
>> >>
>> > So, it looks like the desktop team isn't interested in picking up
beagle
>> > (and they're most of the people in the commit/watchcommit) for the
>> > package. If no one else is willing to take ownership, I think we should
>> > block the package for rawhide and list it as retired for not having
>> > someone interested in working on it.
>>
>> It does not even build on rawhide right now (epiphany related breakage).
>>
>> I dropped it due to lack of time (which is worse rather than better
>> now) but nobody responded to my mail where I was searching for a new
>> maintainer.
Juan just took ownership of beagle, so the issue (not having a
maintainer) is solved now.