On Fri, 9 Aug 2019 at 14:08, Michael Cronenworth <mike@cchtml.com> wrote:
On 8/9/19 8:50 AM, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> Because if we don't, people just gonna ignore FTBFS forever.
>
> Could we have known that gettext will be unretired right away anyway? Probably
> yes, but nobody got time / energy / resources to do any kind of analysis of the
> FTBFS packages.
>
> Next time, I hope that FTBFS bugs for critical component are actually actively
> solved sooner than the retirement happens. We can try to be more aggressive with
> the reminders, but I don't know if that helps, because even currently, packages
> just switch the Bugzilla to ASSIGNED to stop them.

Instead of spending your time on better nag e-mails why don't you look at
contributing patches?

Miro does contribute a lot of patches. There are still a lot of packages which need more than just a patch but someone to take ownership. If you have a problem with these actions please bring them up with FESCO or the Council as this was brought up previously in both places as things that needed to be fixed. They can then work out how this is to be dealt with in the future.


 
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org


--
Stephen J Smoogen.